Uber and Lyft's Receivables: A Financial Ride!

Uber and Lyft, the titans of ride-hailing, have revolutionized urban transportation with their seamless services. Yet, in the realm of financial performance, which of these tech unicorns is truly in the lead? Let’s take a look at the numbers:

In this article, we'll take both Uber and Lyft for a spin and compare some key metrics under the hood. We'll analyze revenue, growth rates, accounts receivable, cash flows, and more to see which company is truly in the driver's seat.

Spoiler alert: It's a neck-and-neck race as both firms continue racking up the miles. But one may start to pull ahead on certain financial figures.

So fasten your seatbelts and join us for a ride through Uber and Lyft's numbers. By the end of this trip down Wall Street, you'll have a firm grasp on which transportation disruptor is truly hitting the gas—and which one has some braking to do when it comes to financials.

It's sure to be a bumpy but illuminating ride. Next stop: the bottom line!

Lyft rides on a negative cash conversion cycle

Over the past five years (2020-2024), Lyft maintained an average negative Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) of -15 days, indicating a swift conversion of investments into cash. 

Notably, in 2021 and 2022, Lyft’s CCC plunged to -16 days and -23 days, respectively, showcasing an aggressive approach to cash conversion. 

By 2023, Lyft’s CCC moderated to -18 days, reflecting ongoing efforts to optimize cash flow processes. By 2024, Lyft further improved to -13 days, emphasizing the sustained focus on enhancing cash conversion efficiency.

In contrast, Uber’s CCC averaged 17 days over the same period, indicating a longer cash conversion cycle compared to Lyft. 

Notably, in 2021, Uber’s CCC spiked to 20 days, while Lyft’s reached its lowest at -16 days, showcasing significant disparities in cash management strategies. 

By 2023, Uber’s CCC stabilized at 15 days, maintaining efficiency in working capital management. By 2024, Uber’s CCC saw a slight increase to 18 days, indicating ongoing operational stability and strategic adaptability in managing cash flow amidst market dynamics.

Now, let’s delve into the specific metrics—Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), Days Payable Outstanding (DPO), and Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO)—to understand better what drove these CCC scores.

Uber’s DSO is lower by 16 days

Over the last five years (2020-2024), Uber and Lyft exhibited distinct trends in their Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), reflecting differences in revenue collection efficiency.

Uber maintained a relatively steady DSO, averaging 33 days, indicating consistent performance in converting sales into cash. In contrast, Lyft showed more variability, with an average DSO of 49 days, suggesting potential challenges in revenue collection compared to Uber.

The most significant disparities between Uber and Lyft in DSO occurred notably in 2021 and 2023. In 2021, Lyft’s DSO stood at 45 days, compared to Uber’s 37 days, indicating a notable difference of 8 days. 

Similarly, in 2023, Lyft’s DSO surged to 57 days, while Uber’s remained stable at 30 days, highlighting a substantial 27-day gap. These differences underscore potential variations in billing practices and customer payment behavior between the two companies over the past five years.

How’s Uber able to consistently maintain steady DSO levels?

We look at the strategies that help Uber have a lower DSO.

Electronic Payments and Partnerships: Uber’s lower DSO compared to Lyft is attributed to its embrace of electronic payment methods and partnerships with service providers. Over 78% of Uber rides in the US are paid with major credit cards, while PayPal, accounting for nearly 20% of rides in Australia, further expedites transactions. This dual strategy accelerates revenue collection, contrasting Lyft’s potentially slower process due to reliance on fewer payment options.

Autonomous Software Integration: Uber’s lower DSO is driven by its integration of autonomous software, like Freeda from HighRadius. This technology learns from customer data to streamline collection processes. By organizing customer lists, providing real-time call guidance, and automating follow-up tasks, Freeda enhances efficiency, reduces aged debt, and contributes to Uber’s lower DSO.

Uber has a near-zero DIO

Analyzing the Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) of Uber and Lyft over the last five years reveals stark differences in their inventory management strategies. 

Uber consistently maintained a zero DIO, indicating a lean inventory model and efficient supply chain management. In contrast, Lyft’s average DIO stood at 103 days, reflecting a considerable amount of inventory held on hand.

The highest disparities between Uber and Lyft in DIO occurred notably in 2021 and 2023. In 2021, Lyft’s DIO was 82 days, while Uber’s remained at 0 days, showcasing a significant difference of 82 days. Similarly, in 2023, Lyft’s DIO surged to 122 days, emphasizing the contrasting inventory management approaches between the two companies.

Uber’s zero DIO suggests highly efficient inventory management, minimizing holding costs and risks associated with inventory obsolescence. In contrast, Lyft’s relatively higher DIO indicates potential areas for improvement in inventory management practices to optimize costs and enhance operational efficiency.

How does Uber maintain a lower DIO than its peers?

Here’s a look at how Uber clears inventory faster.

Dynamic Demand Management: Uber’s agile business model ensures minimal inventory holding through real-time dispatching based on customer demand. Unlike traditional transport companies, Uber activates vehicles only when needed, reducing idle time and optimizing resource utilization, resulting in a near-zero DIO.

Asset-Light Strategy: Uber’s reliance on independent drivers and their vehicles eliminates the need for owning and maintaining a fleet, cutting down on inventory-related costs. By prioritizing platform efficiency over physical assets, Uber achieves a near-zero DIO, focusing on optimizing its network and operations.

Uber pays suppliers 3X times faster

Over the past five years, Uber consistently maintained a lower Days Payables Outstanding (DPO) compared to Lyft, with an average DPO of 16 days versus Lyft’s 50 days. 

In 2023, the largest gap between the two occurred, with Uber at 15 days and Lyft at 47 days.

Even in the most recent year, 2024, Uber’s DPO remained lower at 12 days compared to Lyft’s 43 days. This suggests Uber’s ongoing efficiency in managing supplier payments, reflecting its stronger control over cash flow and working capital.

How does Uber keep a good relationship with its suppliers?

Uber’s Supplier Relationship Management Program: Under this initiative, Uber fosters strategic partnerships through regular engagement, aligning supplier strategies with Uber’s goals. This approach, backed by transparent communication, saw over 60% of strategic suppliers actively supporting Uber during crises like COVID-19. Post-implementation, supplier satisfaction increased by 25%, highlighting the program’s success in driving collaboration.

Strategic Supplier Payment Acceleration: With over 25,000 active suppliers, Uber swiftly processes payments by prioritizing top-tier strategic suppliers. By focusing efforts on these key partners, critical for Uber’s competitive advantage, the company ensures efficient transactions. This approach not only fosters trust and collaboration but also reinforces relationships with suppliers vital for long-term success.

Uber rides past Lyft in the Financial game!

Uber’s knack for working capital management puts it in the driver’s seat, leaving Lyft in the dust. With lower DSO and DPO figures, Uber effortlessly converts sales into cash, all while keeping suppliers happy.

Thanks to its asset-light approach and dynamic demand forecasting, Uber boasts an impressive near-zero DIO, leaving Lyft to grapple with surplus inventory. 

Uber’s cash flow control is second to none, thanks to autonomous software, strategic payment programs, and agile operational techniques. This translates to a consistently lower cash conversion cycle score, faster cash generation, and a rock-solid balance sheet.

While Lyft has made strides in payment options and inventory optimization, Uber’s integrated technologies and streamlined processes put it in the pole position. 

As both companies rev up for growth, the question remains: can Uber maintain its lead as the ridesharing race speeds ahead on the road of innovation? Only time will tell.

Subscribe Now