When a company provides a service to a customer on credit, there is an inherent risk that the customer might not pay on time or might not pay at all for services offered. This unpaid amount is commonly referred to as bad debt. So how do businesses account for these bad debts?
Businesses need to appropriately recognize and record bad debts as expenses in order to balance books, which in turn ensures accurate financial reporting. They can either use the direct write-off method or the allowance method for bad debt recordkeeping.
In this blog, we are going to explore the direct write-off vs. allowance methods and understand how they differ from each other.
The direct write-off method is an accounting method to record uncollectible accounts receivables. As per this method, a bad debt expense is recognized and written off when an invoice is found to be uncollectible. This means that a company will record bad debt as an expense once they deem it to be uncollectible.
The direct write-off method does not run on the assumption that a certain invoice could remain unpaid, and therefore, it does not adhere to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP)’s matching principle. According to the GAAP standards, expenses and revenues need to be recorded in the same accounting period. However, with the direct write-off method, the bad debt expense is not matched with the revenue it helps generate. Due to this, public companies that need to adhere to GAAP accounting standards cannot use the direct write-off method to account for uncollected invoices.
Let’s consider an example to understand how a business uses the direct write-off method to account for bad debts.
Suppose a company ABC provides services to a client for $1000. The client initially promised to pay after three months but didn’t do so. ABC will try to contact the client and send constant reminders about the unpaid invoice. However, ABC notices that the client hasn’t paid the invoice even after six months. At this point, ABC will deem this particular account receivable uncollectible.
To write off this particular bad debt, ABC will record the following journal entry:
Accounts |
Debit |
Credit |
Bad debt expense |
$1000 |
|
Accounts receivable |
$1000 |
According to the allowance method, a company estimates that a certain portion of their outstanding accounts receivable will not be collected. This means that at the end of each accounting period, the company will create an account named ‘allowance for doubtful accounts’ and allocate the estimated uncollectible receivables amount to this account.
Unlike the direct-write off method, the allowance method follows the GAAP standards and is therefore the accepted method of accounting to write off bad debts. Businesses using the allowance method need to estimate the percentage of uncollected accounts receivable at the end of each accounting period. While it’s difficult to predict the accurate amount, they can predict an amount based on past customer behavior.
Now, let’s understand the allowance method better with the help of an example.
Considering our previous scenario, where the ABC company doesn’t receive the bill of $1000 from the client despite their best efforts to collect the amount.
Before ABC even writes off the bad debt, they would have created an ‘allowance for doubtful accounts’ account by predicting the accounts receivable they deem uncollectible. Suppose ABC predicts that out of $100,000 total accounts receivable, $20,000 is uncollectible.
They will record the following journal entry for the same:
Accounts |
Debit |
Credit |
Bad debt expense |
$20,000 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$20,000 |
Now, coming back to the unpaid $1000 invoice. Once ABC discovers that the client is not going to pay, they will use the balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts to write off the bad debt.
The journal entry would be the following:
Accounts |
Debit |
Credit |
Allowance for bad debt |
$1000 |
|
Accounts receivable |
$1000 |
After this, the balance in allowance for doubtful accounts will reduce to $19,000.
Both the direct write-off method and the allowance method for writing off bad debts contrast starkly based on a lot of factors. Here are the major differences between the two:
Criteria |
Direct write-off method |
Allowance method |
Timing |
Bad debt is recognized only when the amount is deemed to be uncollectible, this delays recognition. |
Bad debt is predicted and recognized on the books in the same time period as related sales and is written off using a contra-asset account called ‘allowance for doubtful accounts’. |
Accuracy |
The bad debt written off is accurate as it is based on the actual uncollectible amount. |
An estimate of bad debt is made at the end of the accounting period based on historical customer data. |
Compliance |
Does not comply with GAAP standards as it does not follow matching principle. |
Follows the matching principle and therefore is GAAP compliant. |
Users |
Used by small businesses that do not need to adhere to accounting standards, such as GAAP. |
Used by public and private companies that need to comply with GAAP and other accounting standards. |
Despite being contrasting in nature, direct write-off and allowance methods serve the same purpose. Here are some of the similarities between the two accounting practices to write off bad debt:
HighRadius offers a cloud-based Record to Report Solution that helps accounting professionals streamline and automate the financial close process for businesses. We have helped accounting teams from around the globe with month-end closing, reconciliations, journal entry management, intercompany accounting, and financial reporting.
Our Financial Close Software is designed to create detailed month-end close plans with specific close tasks that can be assigned to various accounting professionals, reducing the month-end close time by 30%.The workspace is connected and allows users to assign and track tasks for each close task category for input, review, and approval with the stakeholders. It allows users to extract and ingest data automatically and use formulas on the data to process and transform it.
Our Account Reconciliation Software provides an out-of-the-box formula set that can configure matching rules and match line-level transactions from multiple data sources and create templates to automate various transaction processing required for month-end close. Our solution has the ability to prepare and post journal entries, which will be automatically posted into the ERP, automating 70% of your account reconciliation process.
Our AI-powered Anomaly Management Software helps accounting professionals identify and rectify potential ‘Errors and Omissions’ throughout the financial period so that teams can avoid the month-end rush. The AI algorithm continuously learns through a feedback loop which, in turn, reduces false anomalies. We empower accounting teams to work more efficiently, accurately, and collaboratively, enabling them to add greater value to their organizations’ accounting processes.
While both allowance and direct write-off methods are used to write off bad debt in the accounting books of a company, the former is considered to be more accurate. This is because the allowance method follows the matching principle and complies with accounting standards such as GAAP.
The direct method recognizes bad debt only when it is identified as uncollectible. The allowance method, on the other hand, estimates bad debt expense at the end of each accounting period and uses allowance for doubtful accounts to write it off. The allowance method follows the matching principle, but the direct method does not.
The direct write-off method is a simple method where businesses can write off the exact bad debt amount that goes uncollected. They don’t need to estimate the bad debt expense beforehand. The journal entries for this method are further straight-forward and don’t require the complications of a contra-asset account.
The direct write-off method of accounting for bad debt isn’t accepted under the GAAP guidelines as it does not follow the matching principle. The bad debt is recorded in the books once it is deemed uncollectible; however, this means that the expense is not recorded in the same period as the revenue is generated.
The allowance method uses a contra-asset account to write off the bad debt expense. The allowance for doubtful accounts is set at the end of each year and is used to write off any bad debt expense that occurs during the accounting period. This method follows the matching principle and is therefore accepted under GAAP.
Automate invoicing, collections, deduction, and credit risk management with our AI-powered AR suite and experience enhanced cash flow and lower DSO & bad debt
HighRadius Autonomous Accounting Application consists of End-to-end Financial Close Automation, AI-powered Anomaly Detection and Account Reconciliation, and Connected Workspaces. Delivered as SaaS, our solutions seamlessly integrate bi-directionally with multiple systems including ERPs, HR, CRM, Payroll, and banks. Autonomous Accounting proactively identifies errors as they happen, provides the project management specifically designed for month end close to manage, monitor, and document the successful completion of tasks, including posting adjusting journal entries, and provides a document repository to support each month’s close process and support the financial audit.