This is the first blog in a blog series that analyzes why the month end financial accounting close takes time. In this blog, we set the stage by identifying the importance of the monthly financial close and discussing the key bottlenecks slowing the process. In subsequent blogs, we will analyze each of the bottlenecks and suggest solutions.

Reasons behind financial close bottlenecks

What is the month end financial close?

The month end close is an accounting process that ensures all financial transactions have been accounted for in the appropriate month.  The month end closing process is required to fulfill the matching principle of accounting which requires expenses along with their associated revenue to be recorded and recognized in the same period.

As an example, expenses paid out after the period they were incurred and the revenue received must be matched and recorded in the period.  It is the accountant’s responsibility through the month end closing process to recognize the expense has not been recorded and accrue for it in the correct period.

Importance of a strategic financial close system

There is little doubt that month close is a significant activity in the finance function which requires the books to be closed quickly and accurately. Needless to say that forecasting cash flow predictions accurately, making strategic business decisions, financial planning, all depend on a successful financial closure.

Ways in which month end closing is crucial to businesses

The month end close process is important to businesses and results in the following ways:

How a month end process looks like

Financial close bottlenecks

The month end close process is a complicated process requiring the gathering, analysis,  reconciliation, and adjustment of account balances, financial transactions, and data from various systems. The procedure comprises a detailed review of the fiscal activity and performance for the entire month as well as corrections for accuracy in order to have confidence that the financial statements accurately reflect the financial activity for the month.

Bottlenecks occur in the financial close because:

  • Without month end close automation, the close process is a fire drill at the end of the month rather than processed through the month
  • There are different processes for different types of accounts and transactions:
    • Some accounts like cash are reconciled
    • Some accounts like prepaid expenses and open purchase orders by account are analyzed
    • Some transactions have to be matched like intercompany transactions
    • Some transactions just need to be reviewed against what is “normal”
  • Poor coordination between all departments participating in the financial close, inefficient workflow, and lack of visibility into the progress of the closing processes.
  • Many tasks are manual, require analysis in Excel, and are outside of the ERP but require time-consuming error-correcting adjustments posted to the ERP or EPM solution
  • No visibility in upstreaming errors or outlier transactions
  • Capacity constraints balancing accuracy against labor cost and time to close

Reasons behind financial close bottlenecks

  1. Lack of a defined process: According to a survey by Deloitte, “the month-close process is often run by institutional memory rather than clear and specific protocols. Different people involved in the process ‘just know how things get done’— and have done it that way for years.”
  2. Lack of financial close automation: A financial close software improves the closing process in the following ways:
    1. Efficiency
    2. Visibility
    3. Timeliness

    Tasks are often delayed in firms that lack automated capabilities due to a key stakeholder being on leave, or consistent delays on routine chores due to competing priorities. For finance leaders looking to incorporate more automation into their operations, beginning with basic, repetitive tasks- areas, where it is relatively straightforward to make a meaningful impact quickly, is a good place to start.

  3. Lack of a defined process: According to a survey by Deloitte,  “the month-close process is often run by institutional memory rather than clear and specific protocols. Different people involved in the process ‘just know how things get done’— and have done it that way for years.”
  4. Since financial close automation cannot be particularly helpful without visibility into the bottlenecks hindering the month-close process, each activity in the close process must be evaluated for its value and purpose during the closure process.

  5. Lack of standardization across the business: Another major issue in automating record to report is the number of stakeholders involved and the lack of defined processes. When external teams other business units provide information to the finance teams, the information offered often varies greatly. People prefer to do things their way, which becomes an issue for processes that need to be uniform across all sectors of a business.
  6. Manual creation of financial statements: The conventional method for creating financial statements entails a lot of ‘cutting and pasting’ from the previous month’s report, including bits of information from different coworkers. It’s difficult to maintain track of various versions and modifications, making it difficult to verify the authenticity and accuracy of the report.
  7. Manual processes are also used in the approval process, and in many firms, executives need to sign off on manual paper copies, which are subsequently maintained for audit purposes. But manual processes are prone to human error. Moreover, any error in the financial statement has a significant impact on a company’s credibility.

    What can the finance team do?

    According to a survey, business leaders attribute challenges in shortening financial close times to a range of issues- 40% of executives say it’s because of internal levels of scrutiny, 35% say it’s a growing need to find and consolidate more detail for financial statements, and 20% say it’s because more time is required to check for errors. Fortunately, technology has come a long way. The majority of the toughest portions of closing – data input, tracking down receipts – can now completely be automated using financial close software.

    What can the finance team do to shorten financial close times

    Ways in which the HighRadius Autonomous Accounting helps in automating record to report are:

    • Provides visibility to upstream errors: The AI-powered anomaly transaction detection module coupled with access to real time data, helps spot irregularities as soon as they happen and correct them using the HighRadius recommendation engine.
    • Automates manual tasks: The ‘connected workspaces’ help with financial close automation by automating manual tasks that take too much time and organizing all the financial close workpapers for auditor review.
    • Improves timeliness and task overview: Increased visibility over all the financial close tasks plus access to real time data allows tasks to be spread out through the entire month while ensuring there are no delays due to inter-dependent tasks, along with automated workflow to ensure maximum efficiency.

    CFOs and finance leaders must lead organizational decision-making processes with insight, speed, and confidence in today’s volatile and disruptive economic environment. Nonetheless, many finance departments still face inefficiencies in routine processes during the month-close and reporting cycle. As a result, shifting time to value-added analysis and decision support is difficult.

    Learn how to make day-zero financial close automation a reality through immediate and accurate decisions.

    In our next blog, we will analyze what it takes to move the month end close to a continuous process through the access to real time data rather than a month end fire drill.  In subsequent blogs we will address:

    1. Organizing the process
    2. Reviewing all transactions against what is “normal” in real-time
    3. Automating account analysis of prepaids and purchase orders
    4. How to automate the account reconciliation process with real-time data
    5. Automatic Matching transactions

Loved by brands, trusted by analysts

HighRadius Named as a Leader in the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Invoice-to-Cash Applications

Positioned highest for Ability to Execute and furthest for Completeness of Vision for the third year in a row. Gartner says, “Leaders execute well against their current vision and are well positioned for tomorrow”

gartner image banner

The Hackett Group® Recognizes HighRadius as a Digital World Class® Vendor

Explore why HighRadius has been a Digital World Class Vendor for order-to-cash automation software – two years in a row.

Hackett Banner

HighRadius Named an IDC MarketScape Leader for the Second Time in a Row For AR Automation Software for Large and Midsized Businesses

For the second consecutive year, HighRadius stands out as an IDC MarketScape Leader for AR Automation Software, serving both large and midsized businesses. The IDC report highlights HighRadius’ integration of machine learning across its AR products, enhancing payment matching, credit management, and cash forecasting capabilities.

IDC Banner

Forrester Recognizes HighRadius in The AR Invoice Automation Landscape Report, Q1 2023

In the AR Invoice Automation Landscape Report, Q1 2023, Forrester acknowledges HighRadius’ significant contribution to the industry, particularly for large enterprises in North America and EMEA, reinforcing its position as the sole vendor that comprehensively meets the complex needs of this segment.

Forrester Banner

1000+

Customers globally

2700+

Implementations

$10.3 T.

Transactions annually

37

Patents/ Pending

6

Continents

Ready to Experience the Future of Finance?

Talk to an expert

Learn more about the ideal finance solution for your needs

Book a meeting

Watch On-demand Demo

Explore our products through self-guided interactive demos

Visit the Demo Center

Explore More Insights

Explore our full suite of Finance Automation capabilities